Skip to content

Comment on TV monitoring service is fair use, judge rules

Comments

I once built a system that pulled multiple TV channels, encoded them on the fly and rebroadcast via multicast over the office LAN to reporter's desks. This was for a newsroom and would have otherwise required dozens of DVB cable drops (and subscriptions). The DirecTV guy was mighty suspicious that I had a pile of Linux boxes set up next to the receivers, and no TVs in sight.

I've heard a similar setup is similar in hotels. The hotel gets a box per channel, re-broadcasts them onto coax (same as VCRs used to put eveything on channel 3, but with more channels), and then the hotel TVs can use their built-in tuners.

It's even moving past that: the last hotel I was at used the TV as a thin client that transmitted incoming IR signals back to its box in the server room.

Needless to say, the latency was atrocious. I even saw a Windows desktop flicker during a channel change.

So that's why hotel TVs always take so long to change channels. I thought they were just really cheaply made tuners.

It's infuriating when you just want to channel surf before bed and ever button press takes 5 seconds to register.

Were you just using HDMI capture cards on each receiver and tuning each to the channel you wanted to capture?

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.