Right, given that as yet no DNA from Kennewick Man is available, I believe it's implied that he may have been the product of intermingling between the theoretical first settlers and the later Bering settlers. No revision of land bridge migration dates would be needed.
Comments
This is interesting. Kennewick man's bones were radiocarbon dated to 8900 years before present, or around 6900 BCE.
I have never heard before that the "Bering land bridge migration" occurred after 6900BCE. That is much more recent than most estimates.
Right, given that as yet no DNA from Kennewick Man is available, I believe it's implied that he may have been the product of intermingling between the theoretical first settlers and the later Bering settlers. No revision of land bridge migration dates would be needed.