The article also suggests using the probe to analyze the composition of other planets. Is that doable? It seems pretty tough to me to carry on a space ship a nuclear probe hot enough to melt rocks.
If we're to the point where we're even considering this, presumably we're in a position to obtain the materials from either local sources, or possibly asteroid sources. This presumes a level of tech much higher than our current one since at our current one we can barely land probes that can drill semi-aimlessly into rocks. (And don't get me wrong, that's a hell of an achievement that gives me the Warm Science Fuzzies that we can pull it off... but it's also a long way from being able to do this sort of probe on other planets.)
If you're going to carry a probe powerful enough to melt rocks on a spaceship, the probe better damn well be nuclear powered. There's no other way to get the energy density to make the launch costs feasible.
Comments
The article also suggests using the probe to analyze the composition of other planets. Is that doable? It seems pretty tough to me to carry on a space ship a nuclear probe hot enough to melt rocks.
If we're to the point where we're even considering this, presumably we're in a position to obtain the materials from either local sources, or possibly asteroid sources. This presumes a level of tech much higher than our current one since at our current one we can barely land probes that can drill semi-aimlessly into rocks. (And don't get me wrong, that's a hell of an achievement that gives me the Warm Science Fuzzies that we can pull it off... but it's also a long way from being able to do this sort of probe on other planets.)
If you're going to carry a probe powerful enough to melt rocks on a spaceship, the probe better damn well be nuclear powered. There's no other way to get the energy density to make the launch costs feasible.
I agree that the prob will have to be nuclear powered. What I find risky is to put it on a spaceship.