Comment on Responsive LogosComments−cateye12yI am not a supporter of omitting information because there is less space. I'd rather choose restructuring of the information.(I guess there is a reason in the first place to display the information. Simply leaving it out feels very wrong. Or it was already unnecessary.)−hxwOP12yI think the whole reason for having a logo mark is to have something is that is immediately recognised, even when the logo type is omitted. You can't/don't always use the full logo, as it isn't always the best visual solution.
Comments
I am not a supporter of omitting information because there is less space. I'd rather choose restructuring of the information.
(I guess there is a reason in the first place to display the information. Simply leaving it out feels very wrong. Or it was already unnecessary.)
I think the whole reason for having a logo mark is to have something is that is immediately recognised, even when the logo type is omitted. You can't/don't always use the full logo, as it isn't always the best visual solution.