Skip to content

Comment on The Next Big Programming Language You’ve Never Heard Ofparent

Comments

Vaguely, yes. It's been a few years since I've written any D, but the initial impetus for the language was "Fix the broken aspects of C++." Rust's core concept is "memory safety with zero overhead."

This means they end up in very similar, yet different places: GC is the default in D, but isn't even a core part of Rust at all. D allows you to turn it off, losing some functionality, Rust allows you to add one in as a library.

Most people in Rust-land have an incredibly high amount of respect for the D team and all they've done, and continue to do.

Walter is answering questions on this article over on proggit: http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/2a20h5/wired_ma...

    >  What goals did you aim to achieve with D?
    > 
    > I wanted to create a language that was both fast and easy
    > to use.
AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.