Wired don't really understand programming, which is ironic.
D is I think something well discussed here.
For the first time in about a decade - possibly two decades - there is a renaissance in programming language design focused on approaching real-World problems. D is a piece of the puzzle, but I think Wired don't quite get yet that it is now the entire solution.
The author isn't a programmer, and as I read more it became clear the audience isn't practicing programmers. (In other words I don't think this is HN material.) I'm not sure who the audience is supposed to be, though. I'm left with the sense that it's the non-technical manager of the programming team, and the article provides a justification for them to force D on the next project.
Comments
Wired don't really understand programming, which is ironic.
D is I think something well discussed here.
For the first time in about a decade - possibly two decades - there is a renaissance in programming language design focused on approaching real-World problems. D is a piece of the puzzle, but I think Wired don't quite get yet that it is now the entire solution.
The author isn't a programmer, and as I read more it became clear the audience isn't practicing programmers. (In other words I don't think this is HN material.) I'm not sure who the audience is supposed to be, though. I'm left with the sense that it's the non-technical manager of the programming team, and the article provides a justification for them to force D on the next project.