That has the same problem as DMCA takedown notices. Anyone could claim to own any address, so then Airbnb would have to verify every address claimed as un-sublettable by a landlord instead of verifying every address claimed as sublettable by a tenant.
I would suspect ownership of physical addresses to be a lot less murky and problematic than copyright ownership since it is a matter of public record and issues of fair use do not come into play. Ownership of a physical address could be verified once and thereafter excluded until a new landlord who buys the property opts-into the service.
IANAL, but I would think that if Airbnb ignored a request to exclude addresses, that would likely expose them to a greater chance of losing a lawsuit.
Additionally, cities or states could pass laws requiring services like Airbnb to have easy opt-out policies for landlords rather than banning the service altogether.
Comments
That has the same problem as DMCA takedown notices. Anyone could claim to own any address, so then Airbnb would have to verify every address claimed as un-sublettable by a landlord instead of verifying every address claimed as sublettable by a tenant.
I would suspect ownership of physical addresses to be a lot less murky and problematic than copyright ownership since it is a matter of public record and issues of fair use do not come into play. Ownership of a physical address could be verified once and thereafter excluded until a new landlord who buys the property opts-into the service.
IANAL, but I would think that if Airbnb ignored a request to exclude addresses, that would likely expose them to a greater chance of losing a lawsuit.
Additionally, cities or states could pass laws requiring services like Airbnb to have easy opt-out policies for landlords rather than banning the service altogether.