Skip to content

Comment on Rackspace Announces API driven Bare Metal Servers

Comments

Can anyone comment on the state of these "microVMs" they speak of? I didn't realize Openstack went that deep in the sense that I thought it was just a VM management platform.

This has nothing to do with OpenStack. I believe they're just saying that someone with an OnMetal server can run any workload they choose.

Disclaimer: I work on the OnMetal team at Rackspace.

The "micoVMs" are Linux containers [1] running within the operating system that is installed on the bare metal.

Since containers start in milliseconds, you gain a tremendous amount of flexibility in what you run on top of these machines. I believe that Pantheon has successfully run ~30k containers (edit: systemd-nspawn, not Docker) on a single machine.

[1] http://www.docker.com/

I thought they wouldn't want to muddle the waters by saying "microvm" instead of just using the term container. I thought they were using something like Mirage:

http://openmirage.org/

Which, imo, would be more exciting.

I wouldn't be shocked to see "MicroVM" become the buzzword for "container". Sounds much nicer for putting in marketing material and pitching to non-technical management. That's especially true given that management has been hearing their tech staff talk about VMs for so long.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.