Copyright restricts copying, it doesn't restrict similar, or even identical, expressions that are independently generated (a jury may see similarity as evidence of copying, so merely the theoretical possibility that a similar work was independently arrived at doesn't get you a free pass from liability, but similarity itself isn't restricted by copyright.)
So, no, the fact that a sequence of bytes occurs in a particular digital recording doesn't mean that the copyright owner of that recording "owns" that series of bytes. It means they own a specified set of rights in that particular recording.
Comments
Copyright restricts copying, it doesn't restrict similar, or even identical, expressions that are independently generated (a jury may see similarity as evidence of copying, so merely the theoretical possibility that a similar work was independently arrived at doesn't get you a free pass from liability, but similarity itself isn't restricted by copyright.)
So, no, the fact that a sequence of bytes occurs in a particular digital recording doesn't mean that the copyright owner of that recording "owns" that series of bytes. It means they own a specified set of rights in that particular recording.