cjdns will never be a workable solution for the general public, and I wish people would stop recommending it.
I disagree...I believe in its current state it is not catering to the general public, but it's basically alpha software with a small bootstrapped network. Long-term, the idea is to make things more user friendly and appeal to a wider audience, but it's inaccurate to say it will "never be workable". Recommending it to a highly-technical targeted audience like HN seems entirely appropriate.
Comments
The author of cjdns himself admits that it is aimed at power users/enthusiasts.
cjdns will never be a workable solution for the general public, and I wish people would stop recommending it.
I disagree...I believe in its current state it is not catering to the general public, but it's basically alpha software with a small bootstrapped network. Long-term, the idea is to make things more user friendly and appeal to a wider audience, but it's inaccurate to say it will "never be workable". Recommending it to a highly-technical targeted audience like HN seems entirely appropriate.
* I run 4 cjdns nodes