Exactly. Stacked charts in general are misleading because they imply volume as a metric to be evaluated, when in any sort of number-over-time chart, volume is the last thing you need people concentrating on.
I wasn't aware of Marimekko charts[1] (well, not by that name anyway) before reading your comment -- but are they commonly used with a time axis? In the examples in [1] they seem like a pretty straight forward visualization of volume?
Off the top of my head I can't think of an example where a time axis wouldn't normally be used to visualize variation over time...? Perhaps quarter earnings as contributing to yearly earnings?
Comments
Exactly. Stacked charts in general are misleading because they imply volume as a metric to be evaluated, when in any sort of number-over-time chart, volume is the last thing you need people concentrating on.
Unless it is a mekko chart in which case the volume conclusion is totally apt.
I wasn't aware of Marimekko charts[1] (well, not by that name anyway) before reading your comment -- but are they commonly used with a time axis? In the examples in [1] they seem like a pretty straight forward visualization of volume?
Off the top of my head I can't think of an example where a time axis wouldn't normally be used to visualize variation over time...? Perhaps quarter earnings as contributing to yearly earnings?
[1] http://www.fusioncharts.com/chart-primers/marimekko-chart/?M...
I've seen Mekko charts, or modified "mekko-ized" waterfall bar charts used with time axes. Blame management consulting.