Comment on Reasons to use protocol buffers instead of JSONparentComments−ithkuil12yOr "I'm making an educated guess". Otherwise how can you get truly surprised when things turn out to be different in the real world :-)I'd also guess it would be more expensive during decoding. So let's compare that with some real data:https://github.com/eishay/jvm-serializers/wiki (old wiki but with some graphs https://code.google.com/p/thrift-protobuf-compare/wiki/Bench...)it turns out that state of the art JSON serialisers aren't so bad after all, especially the serialisation.
Comments
Or "I'm making an educated guess". Otherwise how can you get truly surprised when things turn out to be different in the real world :-)
I'd also guess it would be more expensive during decoding. So let's compare that with some real data:
https://github.com/eishay/jvm-serializers/wiki (old wiki but with some graphs https://code.google.com/p/thrift-protobuf-compare/wiki/Bench...)
it turns out that state of the art JSON serialisers aren't so bad after all, especially the serialisation.