Skip to content

Comment on TrueCrypt suggesting migration to BitLocker?parent

Comments

Well, the thing is though, it's not that they were hosting users' data. It's not like they would be forced to provide the contents of users' communication.

I suppose they could be approached by someone to plant backdoor into the software, but I wonder if that can be done without someone noticing it...

If they put a backdor on the binaries, but not source, lots of people will be compromissed, and for a really long time nobody may notice.

EDIT: I normaly don't care. But this time I'd be glad if who downmoded this post explained why.

Yeah it could be a gag order from a secret court. maybe they folded because they were forced to compromise the code...

considering heartbleed... yes

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.