Skip to content

Comment on Can you solve Seth Godin's math problem? parent

Comments

I live in Canada where we typically get both mpg and liter/100 km. I've found that, almost universally, my friends that report mpg have less fuel efficient cars than the ones that quote liters per 100 km when asked about a vehicle's fuel efficiency.

I tend to think that one of the reasons that Americans tend to have less fuel efficient cars is that when they are evaluating alternatives 9 mpg and 10 mpg are "closer" or more equivalent than 47 mpg and 50 mpg. For example, if I go out and buy a Truck in Canada I could either compare

Ford F150: 15.7 liters/100km (15 mpg) city, 11.2 liters/100km (21 mpg) highway.

GMC Sierra 2500 4WD: 14.7 liters/100km (16 mpg) city, 11.76 liters/100km (20 mpg) highway.

With the Sierra, you are using a full liter less of gas during city driving at the cost of only half a liter of highway driving, so unless I'm doing more than 66% of my driving on highway like conditions, I should go with the Sierra, but that information does not come across to gas conscious buyers that use mpg.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.