Skip to content

Comment on The homogenization of scientific computing (2013)

Comments

I wonder what it'll take for JavaScript to start taking over Python's niches. Is there a numeric library (like Scipy/pandas) hooked up to asm.js yet? I can imagine that being faster than Python.

Javascript will need to fix the mess that is its numeric types. As it currently is, you either need a bignum library with an ungodly syntax, or you are open to losing precision above a certain level, without warning. I tried solving Euler problems with JS, but it's so painful I switched back to Python after a few.

The value objects proposal for es6/es7 might fix that:

http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=strawman:value_object...

Is there a numeric library (like Scipy/pandas) hooked up to asm.js yet? I can imagine that being faster than Python.

Faster than Python using LAPACK and other native libs?

CoffeeScript proved to a lot of people how much more enjoyable JS could be with some of the lessons in language ergonomics learned from Python and Ruby. I think that ES6 really reflects this. With some of the long awaited improvements, like better lambdas, generators, Set/Map, assignment sugar, better metaprogramming of objects, and standard-blessed implementations promises and classes, I think that JS is finally close to being able to compete in the multi-paradigm space. Sweet.js (or some other macro layer) will also really help in letting people develop new syntactic abstractions for domain-specific stuff. It'll be interesting to see how it all develops.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.