It's funny that the FTC was upset that Snapchat couldn't prevent users from taking a screenshot. It's obvious Snapchat cannot prevent that - the user could always point a camera at screen, too.
It's obvious to a software person. The question is whether they made that obvious to their non-technical user. It seems to me that their marketing loves to imply that the message disappears and there is nothing that can be done to save it.
What is curious to me, is this seems like small fish compared to years of "unlimited" and "free" being abused in marketing.
Comments
It's funny that the FTC was upset that Snapchat couldn't prevent users from taking a screenshot. It's obvious Snapchat cannot prevent that - the user could always point a camera at screen, too.
It's obvious to a software person. The question is whether they made that obvious to their non-technical user. It seems to me that their marketing loves to imply that the message disappears and there is nothing that can be done to save it.
What is curious to me, is this seems like small fish compared to years of "unlimited" and "free" being abused in marketing.
Obvious to a software person? Or anyone that has ever used a camera?