Doesn't this line calculate the amount of time it takes to compute a single task? (elapsed time / number of runs = time per run) Doesn't this mean that JXcore is actually faster, since the number would be smaller with more runs?
// Suites of benchmarks consist of a name and the set of benchmarks in
// addition to the reference timing that the final score will be based
// on. This way, all scores are relative to a reference run and higher
// scores implies better performance.
Comments
Wait, I'm confused. From the following line:
https://github.com/Nubisa/jxdocs/blob/master/benchmarks/core...
Doesn't this line calculate the amount of time it takes to compute a single task? (elapsed time / number of runs = time per run) Doesn't this mean that JXcore is actually faster, since the number would be smaller with more runs?
For complete clarity, see also the lines
https://github.com/Nubisa/jxdocs/blob/master/benchmarks/core...
The score is (arbitrary reference constant) / (geometric mean of runtime). Bad performance ==> longer runtime ==> lower scores.
numbers seem less important considering the run times.