I've never seen anything wrong with more communication between stakeholders and adapting a solution to meet their ever-changing needs.
Surely there's a point where more communication starts being detrimental. Reducing it to the absurd: if you spend 100% of the time communicating then you have no time left to actually build the thing. So there's a trade-off, as usual.
It could also be argued that ease of communication to deal with "ever-changing needs" encourages more superficial requirements and less deep thinking about the actual problem, leading to wasted effort and lower quality results.
Maybe you are right, maybe the above paragraph is right. I don't know and neither do you. Replying "nonsense" is not really an argument.
Comments
Surely there's a point where more communication starts being detrimental. Reducing it to the absurd: if you spend 100% of the time communicating then you have no time left to actually build the thing. So there's a trade-off, as usual.
It could also be argued that ease of communication to deal with "ever-changing needs" encourages more superficial requirements and less deep thinking about the actual problem, leading to wasted effort and lower quality results.
Maybe you are right, maybe the above paragraph is right. I don't know and neither do you. Replying "nonsense" is not really an argument.