Skip to content

Comment on How I explained REST to my wife

Comments

I still don't get it. There have been several things I never got or rather they were so obvious / intuitive to me there was nothing for me to "get". Still I spent years thinking I missed something cause so many others had such problems with them. Pointers & recursion come to mind.

There just doesn't seem that much to REST (that's not a bad thing). Lot's of hype, fud, misunderstanding built up around REST. Arguments over the proper way to apply REST to HTTP/Web. But, REST itself seems sort of duh, how else would you do it?

It's not magical rocket science, right?

Many (most?) novel innovations seem obvious and self-evident after the fact. Even rocket science (of course make a pointed tube, fins for stability, and _just_ the right fuel- how else would you do it?)

Have you read Roy's dissertation?

I read it and was surprised at how readable I found it (never mind being a dissertation).

http://www.ics.uci.edu/~fielding/pubs/dissertation/top.htm

What is also really good is Richardson and Ruby's "RESTful Web Services" book. They coined the term "Resource Oriented Architecture" to describe a specific REST design implementation and to side-step a religious war on what is and is not REST.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.