Skip to content

Comment on How 'DevOps' Is Killing The Developerparent

Comments

I went to dependent types specifically because I figured we meant static avoidance without resorting to checked arithmetic. (better performance)

Sure, that would be a good reason to go there. I didn't mean to cast aspersions at dependent types. I was just confused/amused at the typical case being cast as a hypothetical.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.