Skip to content

Comment on A New Development for Coverity and Heartbleedparent

Comments

That's an interesting idea, to have a language and a static analyzer created for each other simultaneously. Constructs that are hard for a static analyzer to reason about would be left out (or relegated to an "unsafe" context). I wonder if there's any work regarding seeing how well rust holds up to the state of the art in static analysis?

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.