Sorry but your own arguments undermine the very points you're trying to make. Yes, charities do need to decide who they want to help in order to succeed, but this supports teacup50's argument that Gnome should've stuck to their own stated aims and scope. Likewise, your examples of "actual destructive discrimination" are aimed in large part at the same group teacup50 was complaining these outreach programs don't help - you're basically arguing that it's OK they're not included in outreach programs because worse things happen to them, but then why have one for women either?
Comments
Sorry but your own arguments undermine the very points you're trying to make. Yes, charities do need to decide who they want to help in order to succeed, but this supports teacup50's argument that Gnome should've stuck to their own stated aims and scope. Likewise, your examples of "actual destructive discrimination" are aimed in large part at the same group teacup50 was complaining these outreach programs don't help - you're basically arguing that it's OK they're not included in outreach programs because worse things happen to them, but then why have one for women either?