It was a bogus DMCA complaint. It would have made the peoe claiming content ownership look again and either proceed with legal action or stop.
If the proceeded with legal action and it was bogus they then have pretty clearly crossed the boundaries required for the criminal element of bogus DMCA complaints.
I agree it's a frustrating and sub optimal situation.
Comments
Did you file a counter notice? I understand it's a simple form and doesn't take too long.
I considered this, but i was under the impression that filing a counter notice would open you(me) up for actual legal complaints ect.
It was a bogus DMCA complaint. It would have made the peoe claiming content ownership look again and either proceed with legal action or stop.
If the proceeded with legal action and it was bogus they then have pretty clearly crossed the boundaries required for the criminal element of bogus DMCA complaints.
I agree it's a frustrating and sub optimal situation.
(Obviously I am not a lawyer).