Skip to content

Comment on RFC7169 – No Secrecy Afforded X.509 extension silently published (on 2014-04-01)

Comments

Believe it or not, there is actual IETF precedence for this:

http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6189#section-11

(which they really should have cited in RFC 7169)

When the IETF was deciding whether to standards-track ZRTP or DTLS-SRTP, one of the decision points was Phil's refusal to remove the disclosure flag from ZRTP. The committee wouldn't consider adopting ZRTP unless the disclosure flag was dropped.

Incidentally, this is also a case of creative patent use. Phil received a patent for some core design elements of ZRTP, then freely licensed the patent as long as you correctly implement the disclosure flag.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.