Skip to content

Comment on Encryption with Gnu Privacy Guard (GPG)parent

Comments

My best guess is that they do not want to buy into the CA infrastructure and provide security using GPG itself.

This may be true (I really have no idea) but isn't it like travelling on a highway at night with your normal lights turned off because you have a better system based on infrared? After reading about the story of that guy who hacked into a computer by MITMing the notepad++ site, I became even more convinced that all pages must have certificates. Nowadays it's also possible to get a basic ssl cert for free, I can't figure out what the catch is really.

Don't get me wrong, I agree with you. Even my personal 100% static content site is served over HTTPS only. I am just commenting on the pattern that any GPG-themed sites I've seen follow.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.