Skip to content

Comment on Websites Must Use HSTS in Order to Be Secureparent

Comments

I've wondered this too. Doesn't DHCP support extensible options? Couldn't you just send an option that said, "hey, crappy portal welcome site at {URL}"? It'd be fixed to a particular webpage (so, you can't use another protocol), but that's the state of things today.

It seems like there are only two things captive-portals are "for", though: accepting EULAs, and presenting a login form for the proxy. Both of these could be better if built into browser/OS chrome.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.