Skip to content

Comment on Why There Are No Girls In San Francisco

Comments

Somehow I suspect the guys who are getting the girls aren't at home writing blog posts about the subject.

I believe the technical term for this is ad hominem. Is it even possible for an argument to be true if it subjects the author to a witty reply? Apparently the Internet would have us believe that all such arguments are a priori certain to be false.

Er, no, it's pointing out a selection bias which means that anyone inclined to take the existence of this person writing about "why there are no girls in SF" (plus, I guess, the apparent shortage of people writing about what a great place SF is for heterosexual men to find partners) as evidence that SF is (functionally) very short of women -- which, let's face it, lots of people would -- should think twice before doing so.

Not an ad hominen at all. ajg is not trying to deny the main proposition, i.e., that there's a shortage of women.

The point is that the shortage doesn't affect all guys equally. The guys with better chances aren't likely theorizing and writing blogs about the shortage.

I don't recall the author claiming he wasn't getting girls. He does, however, seem to be trying to form a logical argument.

The secret is to blog in a cafe with a CC (no, not the c compiler!) sticker on your macbook pro laptop.

creative commons? (really I don't know.)

Yes.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.