More evidence of news that claims to be "in the public interest" will trump the right to privacy of an individual.
If this posting does not get removed by the OP (as has previous articles about this) or is reported by members (as I suspect may have been done previously to others) - it's interesting to me that now the news item itself has become a news item - quite meta. Controversy about the controversy.
I'd suggest that however tasteless and insensitive journalism could be (and I think that they have been here) that we guard against censoring ourselves on this internet forum.
Comments
More evidence of news that claims to be "in the public interest" will trump the right to privacy of an individual.
If this posting does not get removed by the OP (as has previous articles about this) or is reported by members (as I suspect may have been done previously to others) - it's interesting to me that now the news item itself has become a news item - quite meta. Controversy about the controversy.
I'd suggest that however tasteless and insensitive journalism could be (and I think that they have been here) that we guard against censoring ourselves on this internet forum.