First, we're not in a courtroom with the witness under oath. Second, because we're not, we can't cross-examine the witness. Third, even if we could and her recollection is as you say, the balance of evidence would remain heavily tilted against Dorian == Satoshi. Sorry. :)
Comments
Discount it however you want, her testimony is a form of evidence [1]. To say there is "no evidence" is simply and flatly false.
[1] That's a quote from here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Testimony
First, we're not in a courtroom with the witness under oath. Second, because we're not, we can't cross-examine the witness. Third, even if we could and her recollection is as you say, the balance of evidence would remain heavily tilted against Dorian == Satoshi. Sorry. :)