the thing is more nuanced: it is assumed you are evading taxes/laundering money and need to prove otherwise.
If you can prove this money is not untaxed income, than you're fine.
Yes, the duty of proof is opposed to the normal (you need to prove you are innocent).
Comments
Isn't that against EU laws on freedom of movement of currency?
the thing is more nuanced: it is assumed you are evading taxes/laundering money and need to prove otherwise. If you can prove this money is not untaxed income, than you're fine.
Yes, the duty of proof is opposed to the normal (you need to prove you are innocent).