Skip to content

Comment on Mt. Gox Resigns Bitcoin Foundation Board Seatparent

Comments

To be clear here: when broadcasting your transaction to the network, somebody can reissue your transaction with a different ID, but they cannot change the inputs and outputs.

There are other ways to track transactions other than the txid, for example by tracking a unique output address. A normalized hash routine has been added recently: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/3656#issuecomment-35...

Thanks.

Just a naive suggestion (will this work?):

Why not introduce some sort of a 2-phase commit with the original transaction and the newly inserted one on the block-chain? So, before the block-chain transaction is committed, check the two transaction id hashes, if they are different for the request, fail the transaction.

Edit: Of course, the eavesdropper could just as well pass the expected hash back to the originator anyways. :-( Hmmm

That's not necessary. A transaction with a modified id is not a problem unless you falsely rely on the id for payment verification instead of tracking the inputs and outputs by a custom hash.

The biggest flaw here is probably the name "transaction id", because it suggests that a transaction can only have one valid id. The normalized id fixes this issue for most transaction types.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.