Skip to content

Comment on How Google missed the boat

Comments

Their search engine was and still is the glue that holds the web together. So, why didn't they build around that?

Yeah, if only every product they offered either:

a) had comprehensive search capabilities (YouTube, GMail, map, etc)

b) was at least decent integrated with their flagship search (News, YouTube, images, Blogger, heck, Android, etc)

c) was a variant of their flagship search (images, news, sound, etc)

I think it's fair to say that Drive/Docs/Keep and Calendar are fairly independent of Search. Tsk, tsk, for shame.

It's worth noting that when G+ launched (oddly missing from your list), it didn't have search.

Even now, while G+ has search (and yes, it's both fast and comprehensive in that everything is indexed), it's missing tools -- you cannot search by author, by date, or by content type (posts vs. contents). Search is balkanized: you can search ... "pages" from the search bar (along with posts and content which is what you likely want), but to search a Community you've first got to navigate to it, then realize that the thing that doesn't look like a search dialog is actually a search dialog.

There's no negation (you can't exclude people or terms), you can't search by user, you can't search by date ranges.

All that said: search was the one thing G+ really had going for it.

That's a good point.

It was missing from my list because I honestly never use G+ search and didn't know how to best assess it.

I was pretty gobsmacked when it showed up missing.

For a while there, before Google's "you will be assimilated* policy really showed itself, Search was about the best thing about G+. I've since abandoned it largely for Reddit, which does have a featureful search, though it's not comprehensive (comments aren't indexed).

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.