Skip to content

Comment on Bitcoin’s Value Falls 10% as Faltering Mt.Gox Exchange Continues to Implodeparent

Comments

This isn't the first time a Bitcoin company has imploded taking a large amount of customer funds with it. A lot of people have also seen this train wreck coming for a long time, like nearly 10 months ago it was obvious something wasn't quite right. Many people had already moved from Gox to more reputable exchanges like Bitstamp or Coinbase. This might effect Bitcoin in the near term while this shakes out but long term I doubt it will be more than a sentence in this history of Bitcoin's rise.

This is so harmful, because Mt Gox has been seen as the main exchange by many people, despite being almost useless for withdrawing USD for many months. People should have been avoiding it like the plague, but it was still a large percentage of the market.

One lesson here is that an exchange shouldn't be used as a wallet, i.e. Don't keep funds there for a significant length of time. Put your usd/btc in there, make your trades, then take the btc/usd out asap.

Coinbase has had it's share of hiccups and software fails as well. Are they still on MongoDB?

On the scale of things that concern me getting your $5 million US bank account seized by the US Government ranks above software reliability issues with Mongo DB.

Is there something wrong with MongoDB that I don't know about? Is it not suitable for Coinbase's business?

So I don't have a horse in this race. I'm PostgreSQL-or-MariaDB kinda guy. Just trying to understand what's wrong wtih MongoDB. I agree I see a bunch of complaints in that HN thread, but I also see this:

http://www.mongodb.org/about/production-deployments/

There some heavy-weight companies on that list using MongoDB. eBay, SAP, stripe.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.