There's nothing wrong with having a brand name that doesn't explicitly say what the company does (reminds me of the Forest Gump quote "We invested in some apple company"). Their site get millions of visitors per month; they'd lose staggering amounts of brand equity at this point by changing names. Besides, I'm willing to bet that the vast majority of its users don't know the origins of Justin.tv.
Comments
It does if you consider it JustIn.tv.
There's nothing wrong with having a brand name that doesn't explicitly say what the company does (reminds me of the Forest Gump quote "We invested in some apple company"). Their site get millions of visitors per month; they'd lose staggering amounts of brand equity at this point by changing names. Besides, I'm willing to bet that the vast majority of its users don't know the origins of Justin.tv.