Comment on Toward Go 1.3parentComments−codygman12yI don't see the irony. It's a contrast of a class based and object oriented language vs a functional language. The functional language leads to a much simpler call graph than the OOP language.−bad_user12yThe irony is that Go is not a functional programming language.−codygman12yYou're right. One of the reason it has simpler call graphs and less complexity is because it is composition based and struct rather than class based.
Comments
I don't see the irony. It's a contrast of a class based and object oriented language vs a functional language. The functional language leads to a much simpler call graph than the OOP language.
The irony is that Go is not a functional programming language.
You're right. One of the reason it has simpler call graphs and less complexity is because it is composition based and struct rather than class based.