Just wanted to chime in and affirm your experience. I also love functional programming and have used Haskell for several projects (and will continue to do so). But I also use and love Go.
Like you, I've bumped up against areas where some form of generics beyond structural subtyping would have helped me solve a problem more elegantly. But it's never been a huge issue.
I think the primary reason why I'm drawn to Go is that I perceive it to be incredibly simple (like, Lua simple). Not just the language design, but the entire ecosystem---from idioms to tooling.
Comments
Just wanted to chime in and affirm your experience. I also love functional programming and have used Haskell for several projects (and will continue to do so). But I also use and love Go.
Like you, I've bumped up against areas where some form of generics beyond structural subtyping would have helped me solve a problem more elegantly. But it's never been a huge issue.
I think the primary reason why I'm drawn to Go is that I perceive it to be incredibly simple (like, Lua simple). Not just the language design, but the entire ecosystem---from idioms to tooling.