Skip to content

Comment on Lisp: More is lessparent

Comments

To be clear, I'm not suggesting it's an important question per se.

_delerium presented an argument that the things people do with macros should be implemented as language facilities instead. Ve used racket contracts as an example.

I was saying that if racket contracts are not implemented as language facilities, it's not a very good example.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.