Skip to content

Comment on Lisp: More is lessparent

Comments

It might be, but I imagine having an OS where Lisp is the systems programming language is way different from a system where it is just another language.

Yeah, but that does not make it 'better' or more useful.

Lisp-based operating systems are no longer used, because they were quite complex (coming out of a research environment) and provided LESS functionality in some crucial areas (for example they were not multi-user - they were one-person, one machine, one 'world'). Additionally they were expensive.

The Xerox Lisp and Xerox Smalltalk workstations one could buy were severely underpowered (RAM, speed, ...).

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.