Skip to content

Comment on The public trusts scientists—but not their conclusionsparent

Comments

I honestly think that the only possible reason for this has to be either ignorance or religion. If you demonize one section of science far enough, you're probably self-indoctrinated to believe that all science is bad. Consider someone who believes that climate change is not happening and that the entire scientific community is in on this giant scam. Once you extend a conspiracy theory to such a large level, the only way you can rationalize your beliefs is to demonize the entire population of practicing scientists because they have to be "in on it." Of course, were you to then be asked if science has been a good thing, you'll answer in the negative, even though you would never survive without air conditioning, processed food, and your precious Range Rover.

Maybe it's much simpler than that. When people hear the word scientist, they think "men in white lab coats". If that's what they think scientists are, then all the responses make some sort of sense.

The depressing thing is that people who believe in conspiracy theories are generally reasonably smart people, who have nuanced opinions on a lot of topics, and are often well educated. In order to believe in a conspiracy theory you have to have at least a passing understanding of whatever accepted truth it is you don't believe in. That puts those people leagues ahead of the ignorant-and-proud-of-it.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.