Comment on Pros and Cons of Mobile SEOparentComments−ig0rskeeOP17yWell, it's pretty much a standard:cnn.com & m.cnn.comfacebook.com & m.facebook.comgmail.com & m.gmail.comSo definitely disagree with the notion of "fundamentally flawed" as literally every significant site is doing it at this point−onreact-com17yYeah, but do we need Gmail or Facebook crawled? No, both are private. They don't get indexed at all.The CNN site is quite messed up. Check this:"2 U.S. Marines killed in Afghanistan" site:cnn.comYou have duplicate content twice + the mobile version does not even contain the article when you click on the search snippet.
Comments
Well, it's pretty much a standard:
cnn.com & m.cnn.com
facebook.com & m.facebook.com
gmail.com & m.gmail.com
So definitely disagree with the notion of "fundamentally flawed" as literally every significant site is doing it at this point
Yeah, but do we need Gmail or Facebook crawled? No, both are private. They don't get indexed at all.
The CNN site is quite messed up. Check this:
"2 U.S. Marines killed in Afghanistan" site:cnn.com
You have duplicate content twice + the mobile version does not even contain the article when you click on the search snippet.