Convenience is exactly what I use in my real life. My texting security is whatever Apple implements in iMessage. I'd be a lot more paranoid if I were a "smuggler" or "revolutionary".
There's also the wrench cryptanalysis discussed in xkcd.com/538. For most people the mouseover text nails it:
Actual actual reality: nobody cares about his secrets.
The fact that you can't have complete security is not an argument for abdicating the effort, nor a valid criticism of anything that moves in the right direction. At least you can get to a better position in terms of (a) lower probability of compromise and (b) imposing more time and expense on the adversary.
Comments
How do you compile your code? (Thompson reflections on trusting trust)
And beyond source-code:
How do you shield your equipment? (tempest, also active attack)
How do you guard your equipment? (evil maid)
Real life is the triumph of convenience over security :(
Convenience is exactly what I use in my real life. My texting security is whatever Apple implements in iMessage. I'd be a lot more paranoid if I were a "smuggler" or "revolutionary".
There's also the wrench cryptanalysis discussed in xkcd.com/538. For most people the mouseover text nails it:
The fact that you can't have complete security is not an argument for abdicating the effort, nor a valid criticism of anything that moves in the right direction. At least you can get to a better position in terms of (a) lower probability of compromise and (b) imposing more time and expense on the adversary.