The state has exactly the right to regulate contracts. We don't actually live in the libertarian dream you are pretending we do. Many people like to live in a democracy where money is not the only form of power, but where votes are powerful too.
We don't actually live in the libertarian dream you are pretending we do.
What? Our constitution already protects our rights to freely sign legal contracts between each others. Since when is that a libertarian thing? TIL.
Many people like to live in a democracy where money is not the only form of power, but where votes are powerful too.
Who's talking about money? People are already free to accept or not their contract with Google. What you want is allow people to vote for other people to be forbidden to sign a contract of _their_ choice with Google, you want people to vote to restrain other's freedom. That's the opposite of freedom and what our constitution is about.
Which country's constitution are you referring to? In any case, the government clearly has the right to regulate what contracts can be legally entered into.
Comments
The state has exactly the right to regulate contracts. We don't actually live in the libertarian dream you are pretending we do. Many people like to live in a democracy where money is not the only form of power, but where votes are powerful too.
What? Our constitution already protects our rights to freely sign legal contracts between each others. Since when is that a libertarian thing? TIL.
Who's talking about money? People are already free to accept or not their contract with Google. What you want is allow people to vote for other people to be forbidden to sign a contract of _their_ choice with Google, you want people to vote to restrain other's freedom. That's the opposite of freedom and what our constitution is about.
Which country's constitution are you referring to? In any case, the government clearly has the right to regulate what contracts can be legally entered into.