Skip to content

Comment on Ask HN: Why are nasty comments more common on HN?

Comments

I think HN is better than many other websites, but certainly worse than some. Obvious reasons:

1. Internet disinhibition effect enhanced by pseudonymity - anyone can create an account called 'internettoughguy3' and start talking shit to people; blatant sockpuppetry/nastiness is punished by the mods, but one can get away with it on an occasional basis.

2. Common interest in hacking-type stuff brings together people whose views diverge on other things, like religion and especially politics; conflict ensues.

3. Persistence; sort of the opposite of #1, many of us have been here for years and know how to 'push each others' buttons,' so lingering dislike or disagreement between individuals will occasionally boil over into a cutting remark.

4. Geeks tend to be introverted and so less good at social modeling. http://xkcd.com/610/ sums this up, though I think the dig at Ayn Rand fans is a bit unfair because such thinking is equally prevalent on the left.

None of the above apply to me, of course. I am perfect.

2. Common interest in hacking-type stuff brings together people whose views diverge on other things, like religion and especially politics; conflict ensues.

Not just that, but we're also generally quite opinionated and thus argumentative on hacking-type stuff even though it's a common interest.

I agree.

Also, a lot of people with positive reaction just upvote an article. If you consider upvotes as positive comments, the ratio is way different.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.