Skip to content

Comment on More details on Microsoft's new M# language

Comments

It's not a completely horrible post. It puts in one place some speculation that I have only seen in various outlets so far. I get the feeling that her citing "several different sources of mine" is just random posts by people on HN and Reddit.

I thought the M# name was completely made up during speculation, but it does indeed appear in the job posting [0] (you have to click the Job ID target 837005 to see the text) cited in this [1] reddit comment. (Edit: it's not entirely clear if M# and the language being discussed are the exact same language. I would assume they share some ideas, at least. Microsoft can't be _that_ fragmented, I would hope.)

The discussion thread on LtU hasn't pick up much steam, probably due to mid-holiday lull. I'm still a but confused about Charles Torre's comments re: HN/Reddit speculation. D and Rust were brought up in the the main source blog post [2], not by random speculators. He's right that we don't have "many of the details required to make intelligent comparisons", which is a shame. Charles also states in the comment

"Joe mentioned his desire for openness for the technology (as in open source AND open communication/transparency). That we can have this conversation in the open means Microsoft is turning a corner vis a vis transparency. I hope this trend continues."

Let's see it then. Until then, there isn't much more to say.

[0] https://careers.microsoft.com/resumepreview.aspx?aid=111551

[1] http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1tvic1/the_micr...

[2] http://joeduffyblog.com/2013/12/27/csharp-for-systems-progra...

Edit: Tracing the various sources for parts of the speculation is interesting on its own. The various projects being cited show that Microsoft has spent a long time in this research space. I remember hearing about the Singularity OS [3] project at Microsoft, and wondering what we would see come out of it.

[3] https://research.microsoft.com/en-us/projects/singularity/

Well, Mary Jo Foley is a well known blogger with sources deep inside MS, and has been right on so many rumoured things, I'd say her sources are a bit better than reading Reddit; the problem arises in trying not to burn those sources, so discussing public info and adding her extra knowledge to it is a good way of achieving that.

There is a post on G+ about the error model:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6983904

The author is participating in this reddit thread:

http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1tzk5j/the_m_er...

Thanks for the links. I saw that post on /r/programming earlier today, but hadn't investigated it yet. It'll be interesting to see some real ideas come out.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.