>He’s got it all backwards. The nature of progress is to move incrementally.
What a strange straw man to pick. Isn't it glaringly obvious that progress happens in leaps and then incrementally in between the leaps? The leaps create opportunity that is exploited in the years following the leap.
If there is no leap for a while, this incremental progress starts to feel like stagnation. Some feel it earlier, some feel it later. It seems rather contrived to present this as some kind of fundamental contradiction.
Comments
>He’s got it all backwards. The nature of progress is to move incrementally.
What a strange straw man to pick. Isn't it glaringly obvious that progress happens in leaps and then incrementally in between the leaps? The leaps create opportunity that is exploited in the years following the leap.
If there is no leap for a while, this incremental progress starts to feel like stagnation. Some feel it earlier, some feel it later. It seems rather contrived to present this as some kind of fundamental contradiction.