I'm probably going to regret this, but let's accept the premise that programming languages are both gendered and a product of "the patriarchy"
Why? The linked article doesn't make or depend on that argument.
Your entire response seems to be based on a bunch of presumptions about the word "feminism" and not one bit of actually addressing what is presented in the linked article.
Comments
Why? The linked article doesn't make or depend on that argument.
Your entire response seems to be based on a bunch of presumptions about the word "feminism" and not one bit of actually addressing what is presented in the linked article.