The main idea of the article, namely wasting tax payers money (1), is probably the most interesting thing.
Regarding security, sure foreign spies don't need that kind of information. But how about the average "joe" who holds a grudge against him, who just wants to "scare" him a little bit?
(1)
"A great deal of taxpayers' money has been spent over the past several decades making sure he and his family are protected from security compromises. Well, it doesn't seem to be very relevant anymore, does it?"
Comments
The main idea of the article, namely wasting tax payers money (1), is probably the most interesting thing.
Regarding security, sure foreign spies don't need that kind of information. But how about the average "joe" who holds a grudge against him, who just wants to "scare" him a little bit?
(1)
"A great deal of taxpayers' money has been spent over the past several decades making sure he and his family are protected from security compromises. Well, it doesn't seem to be very relevant anymore, does it?"