Is anyone able to verify the signature? GnuPG gives me a BADSIG error.
I was actually looking for what info was included in the signature (e.g. a timestamp), but it seems KGPG doesn't provide that. However the sig itself does not even seem to be valid, though it's probably because I copied it out of Google's cache.
Comments
Is anyone able to verify the signature? GnuPG gives me a BADSIG error.
I was actually looking for what info was included in the signature (e.g. a timestamp), but it seems KGPG doesn't provide that. However the sig itself does not even seem to be valid, though it's probably because I copied it out of Google's cache.
Edit: For some reason, this does validate for me: https://gist.github.com/krallja/7710464
Validates fine if you get the raw gist:
curl 'https://gist.github.com/krallja/7710464/raw/8d55ac6fb74e979b... | gpg -v
(...)
gpg: Good signature from "Baal_signing <Baal <Use-Author-Supplied-Address-Header@[127.1]>>" aka (...)
Yes I managed to get this already, thanks though!
It was probably Google's cache that was giving trouble, the Github one worked fine.