I investigated and I say this is wrong. No backup either.
= The point.
Now then again, I actually fly every of these so I pretty much know what the efficiency is.
YES they gain 25% efficiency with the tricopter that has a huge prop in the middle, I TRUST that. But the test is meaningless:
If you change the 3 props instead and put big props, with corresponding motors. Guess what. Efficiency is probably higher than the 25% difference. I actually design my own. In fact, I also design my own control boards (the software that is)
Quadcopters use accelerometers, barometers, gyroscopes and magnetometers (and GPS) to ensure stability.
Guess what. Measurement from these devices isn't 0ms. Actuating the motor control isn't 0ms.
On regular 1 rotor head heli it isn't either. In fact, it's longer.
Result? it's more stable with 4 props than one prop. It has more inherent stability., even if it wasn't "computer assisted". Timecop did a fully gyro stabilized quad copter recently that shows exactly that, if any "actual proof" was needed. Gyro stabilized can be made with no computer whatsoever (like helicopters are/used to be - that's why they're very, very hard to pilot, real ones and RC ones).
Comments
I investigated and I say this is wrong. No backup either. = The point.
Now then again, I actually fly every of these so I pretty much know what the efficiency is.
YES they gain 25% efficiency with the tricopter that has a huge prop in the middle, I TRUST that. But the test is meaningless:
If you change the 3 props instead and put big props, with corresponding motors. Guess what. Efficiency is probably higher than the 25% difference. I actually design my own. In fact, I also design my own control boards (the software that is)
Quadcopters use accelerometers, barometers, gyroscopes and magnetometers (and GPS) to ensure stability. Guess what. Measurement from these devices isn't 0ms. Actuating the motor control isn't 0ms.
On regular 1 rotor head heli it isn't either. In fact, it's longer.
Result? it's more stable with 4 props than one prop. It has more inherent stability., even if it wasn't "computer assisted". Timecop did a fully gyro stabilized quad copter recently that shows exactly that, if any "actual proof" was needed. Gyro stabilized can be made with no computer whatsoever (like helicopters are/used to be - that's why they're very, very hard to pilot, real ones and RC ones).