Skip to content

Comment on Should Quadrotors All Look Like This?parent

Comments

Ok you can be deliberately dense if you like. Its pretty apparent to me that a maneuverable drone that can navigate urban environments, hover, identify a target then decide to act is quite different from the blunt-instrument mortars and million-dollar airplane drones we use now.

Science-fiction? You just watched the video, and you dismiss it somehow as fantasy?

For instance, for assassination, intimidation, even spying (look in a 30th-floor window, relay audio and video) a rotored drone has no equal.

It'll be amusing to see the expression on your face the first time a quad-rotor drone peers in your window. "Hey! That can't be! It's impractical in the scenarios I've imagined!"

You just expressed several views with which I have no disagreement. Your original statement was:

However, that helicopter seems ideal for antipersonnel rapid assault. Add an ounce of C4 and how could you defend against it?

I asked some pretty pointed questions about that hypothetical, and you haven't offered any rebuttal. I've also tried to explore their utility from the viewpoint of a guerrilla soldiers and a nation state.

Yes, I believe that small drones will be utilized. Yes, I believe they will be weaponized. Yes, I believe we really should do something about it! I just don't think the small ones will be weaponized in the way you're suggesting (strap on an ounce of C4 and send them in swarms). That's all.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.